Most programming languages today provide some way to bind the lifetime of a resource (for instance, a file handle) to a scope within a program, and implicitly clean it up when that scope ends. We can use destructors in C++, using blocks in C#, or with statements in Python. In Go, we use defer. As far as I can tell, this pattern originates in C++ and is called either Resource Acquisition Is Initialization (RAII), or Scope-Bound Resource Management (SBRM). It has various applications that range from resource deallocation (such as file handling, smart pointers, or locks) to scoped utility functions, as I’ve shown in my 2016 article, “Scope Bound Resource Management in C#“.
To understand what we’re talking about and why it’s useful, we first need to start with life without SBRM. Consider a simple program where we read the contents of a file:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"os"
"time"
)
func main() {
file, err := os.Open("example.txt") // open the file
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to open file!")
return
}
data := make([]byte, 4)
_, err = file.Read(data) // read 4 bytes from the file
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to read the file!")
return
}
fmt.Println(string(data)) // print the data from the file
file.Close() // close the file
time.Sleep(time.Second) // pretend to do other work afterwards
}
Here, we’re opening a file, doing something with it, and then (like good citizens) closing it. We’re also doing something afterwards. However, this is in itself quite error-prone. Here are a few things that could happen which would jeopardise that Close() call:
- We might forget to call
Close()entirely. - An early return (e.g. due to an error) might skip the call to
Close(). - A more complex function with multiple branching might not reach
Close()due to a mistake in the logic.
We can improve the situation by using defer. Putting the Close() call in a defer statement makes it run at the end of the function, whether there was an error or not. To illustrate, we’ll try to open a file that doesn’t exist, and use a Println() instead of the actual Close() to be able to see some output:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"os"
)
func main() {
_, err := os.Open("nonexistent.txt") // open the file
defer fmt.Println("Closing")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println("Failed to open file!")
return
}
}
Because the deferred statement runs at the end of the function in any case, we see “Closing” in the output:
Failed to open file!
Closing
defer is useful to ensure resources are cleaned up, but it’s not as good as SBRM constructs from other languages. One drawback is that there’s no actual requirement to use defer when allocating a resource, whereas something like C#’s using block ensures that anything allocated with it gets disposed at the end of its scope.
Another disadvantage is that it is function-scope only. Let’s imagine we have this program where we do a series of time-consuming tasks:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
)
func main() {
fmt.Println("Doing hard work...")
time.Sleep(time.Second)
fmt.Println("Doing harder work...")
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
fmt.Println("Doing even harder work...")
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
fmt.Println("Finished!")
}
We’d like to benchmark each step. In “Scope Bound Resource Management in C#“, I was able to wrap statements in a using block with a utility ScopedTimer that I created. Like C#, Go has blocks based on curly brackets, so let’s try and (ab)use them to measure the time taken by one of the tasks:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
)
func main() {
fmt.Println("Doing hard work...")
{
startTime := time.Now()
defer fmt.Printf("Hard work took %s", time.Since(startTime))
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
fmt.Println("Doing harder work...")
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
fmt.Println("Doing even harder work...")
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
fmt.Println("Finished!")
}
The output is:
Doing hard work...
Doing harder work...
Doing even harder work...
Finished!
Hard work took 148ns
Two things went wrong here:
- The benchmark measured 148 nanoseconds for a task that took one second! That’s because the
time.Since(startTime)got evaluated right away rather than when defer started executing its statement. - The benchmark for the first task only got printed at the end of the entire function. That’s because
deferruns at the end of the function, not at the end of the current scope.
We can fix the first problem by wrapping the deferred statement in an anonymous function that executes itself (which in the JavaScript world would be called an Immediately Invoked Function Expression or IIFE):
// ...
{
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Hard work took %s", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
// ...
We now get a benchmark of about 6 seconds, simply because defer is still running at the end of the function:
Doing hard work...
Doing harder work...
Doing even harder work...
Finished!
Hard work took 6.002184229s
To fix this benchmark, we have to fix the second problem, which is that defer runs at the end of the function. What we want is to use defer to measure the duration of each task inside the function. We have a number of ways to do this, but since defer is function scoped, they all involve the use of functions.
The first option is to break up main() into separate functions for each task:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
)
func runTask1() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Hard work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}
func runTask2() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Harder work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
}
func runTask3() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Even harder work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
}
func main() {
fmt.Println("Doing hard work...")
runTask1()
fmt.Println("Doing harder work...")
runTask2()
fmt.Println("Doing even harder work...")
runTask3()
fmt.Println("Finished!")
}
This does produce correct results:
Doing hard work...
Hard work took 1.000149001s
Doing harder work...
Harder work took 2.001123261s
Doing even harder work...
Even harder work took 3.000039148s
Finished!
However:
- It is quite verbose.
- It duplicates all the benchmarking logic.
- Although many people advocate for smaller functions, I find it easier to read longer functions if the operations are sequential and there’s no duplication, rather than hopping across several functions to understand the logic.
Another way we could do this is by retaining the original structure of main(), but using IIFEs instead of curly brackets to delineate the scope of each task:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
)
func main() {
fmt.Println("Doing hard work...")
func() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Hard work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(time.Second)
}()
fmt.Println("Doing harder work...")
func() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Harder work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
}()
fmt.Println("Doing even harder work...")
func() {
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("Even harder work took %s\n", time.Since(startTime))
}()
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
}()
fmt.Println("Finished!")
}
It works just as well:
Doing hard work...
Hard work took 1.000069185s
Doing harder work...
Harder work took 2.001031904s
Doing even harder work...
Even harder work took 3.001086566s
Finished!
This approach is interesting because we actually managed to create scopes inside a function where defer could operate. All we did was put each task and its respective benchmarking logic inside an anonymous function and execute it right away. So the sequential code works just the same whether this anonymous function is there or not; it only makes a difference for defer.
Of course, we are still duplicating code in a very uncivilised way here, so we’ll move onto the third approach, which is simply to implement the benchmarking logic in a helper function and use it to execute the task itself:
package main
import (
"fmt"
"time"
)
func runBenchmarked(actionName string, doAction func()) {
fmt.Printf("Doing %s...\n", actionName)
startTime := time.Now()
defer func() {
fmt.Printf("%s took %s\n", actionName, time.Since(startTime))
}()
doAction()
}
func main() {
runBenchmarked("hard work", func() {
time.Sleep(time.Second)
})
runBenchmarked("harder work", func() {
time.Sleep(2 * time.Second)
})
runBenchmarked("even harder work", func() {
time.Sleep(3 * time.Second)
})
fmt.Println("Finished!")
}
The runBenchmarked() function takes care of everything about each task: it prints a message when it’s about to start, executes the task itself, and prints the time it took using the same defer statement we’ve been using for benchmarking. To do this, it takes the name of the task (as a string) as well as the task itself (as a callback function).
Then, in main(), all we need to do is call runBenchmarked() and pass the name of the task and the task itself. This results in the code being brief, free of duplication, and nicely scoped, which I believe is the closest we can get in Go to the SBRM constructs of other languages. The output shows that this works just as well:
Doing hard work...
hard work took 1.000901126s
Doing harder work...
harder work took 2.001077689s
Doing even harder work...
even harder work took 3.001477287s
Finished!
Conclusion
defer in Go provides some degree of SBRM support for scoped cleanup or utility purposes. However, it suffers from the following drawbacks:
- It does not enforce implicit cleanup of allocated resources as similar constructs in other languages do.
- Any parameters that need to be evaluated at the end of the scope should be wrapped in an IIFE.
- It is function-scoped, therefore using
deferfor a limited/block scope inside a function requires it to be wrapped in another function.
